How can we fix the economy?

i'm not sure, that's for sure. but part of me feels that the polarization of wealth into the top 1% of the world's pockets has something to do with it. so, short of them just giving it all back, how can you feasibly make more money happen?

i mean, you can't start eliminating people, that would be inhumane. i think we are really in a no-win situation. because its almost like you need to either ADD a lot of people (grown ones too) to our population or you need to REMOVE a lot of people somehow.

hmmm...

wouldn't the stimulus had been a lot better and more productive if every tax paying citizen were given, say, $15,000 each, rather than what they just pulled off?

hmmm...

Comments (Comment Moderation is enabled. Your comment will not appear until approved.)
ethan's Gravatar Well, if you look at it historically we need to reinstate the punitive tax rate above some amount. Back in 1980 it was 68 percent on anything above 3.5 million i think. In the 50's it was 78 percent. They idea is that the free market only works as long as there are not high concentration of wealth-since the market really becomes their playground. Also no one "needs" more than 3.5 million(it could be bumped to 15 mil in todays dollar) to live well and if they choose to not work to earn more as most of it would go to taxes that would allow another person/company to pickup that slack-spreading it out.

So with that in place rich people and corporations can either pay it or spend the money and write it off. Giving tax breaks has only allowed them to put the money in massive shelters off shore. It's like all the money is sucked up into these few corn silos and we are playing around with the husks.

Also we need Social Security tax to apply on all income not just the first 125k. The fund would be solvent in one year.
# Posted By ethan | 2/24/09 5:43 PM
tony's Gravatar i thoroughly agree and i had not heard of the punitive tax up until this point, so im going to go read a bit. but i like the sounds of it... and from what you have talked about sounds exactly what i was trying to talk about...
# Posted By tony | 2/24/09 6:00 PM
ethan's Gravatar you want to listen to thom hartmann http://www.thomhartmann.com/ that guy knows more about the history of the laws all the way back to the signing of the constitution. It's where i found out about it. I guess many of the fathers were very concerned that unlimited wealthy would just create Kingdoms of wealth where the kings power was money rather than religion. Pretty interesting stuff.
# Posted By ethan | 2/24/09 6:08 PM
Damon Gentry's Gravatar @ethan: I really don't think it's your place (or mine) to determine just how much money a person (of family) 'needs' as income. If we draw the line once, believe me, it will only be a matter of time before that line starts moving closer and closer to your wallet.

@all: I believe that the rich keep getting richer because they keep doing the things that got them rich in the first place. Ditto for the poor.

The stimulus plan I would like to have seen would have been to repeal the income tax for the first 5 months of the year. That proposal would cost the U.S. government the same $800B (in lost revenue) that they are spending now. You and I would see our paychecks increase anywhere from 5% - 25% every week from January until June.

That plan was proposed by some junior congressman but was quickly shelved. You see, when you put money into the hands of the tax payers, you put the power to fix the economy in the hands of the people most affected by it. But if government is spending that money, the power remains just where they want it. And they get to pick the economic winners and losers. (IE: GM, Citibank, etc...)

If you are really interested in tax reform, take the time to read about the 'Fair Tax' at fairtax.org.
# Posted By Damon Gentry | 2/24/09 6:34 PM
Najier's Gravatar It is the 'Roschilds' family who have created this problem, not once but many times in a polymorphic way.

Boy, how stupid can our govt be. Don't they recognize it is the same Jesse James gang stealing money once again but this time using a much more sophisticated scheme.

Totally agree with the $15K per person.

By the way, if you get rid of Interest-based systems, the problem is fixed overnight.
# Posted By Najier | 2/24/09 6:58 PM
Mike Rankin's Gravatar +1 for the FairTax. It would have saved us 2 Trillion dollars already. It would also bring an estimated 13 Trillion! dollars of foreign investment into the country. Put that in your stimulus and smoke it.

I find it interesting that Democrats seem to line up against the FairTax when, to me, it seems like it lines up better with Democratic ideals with Republican ones.
# Posted By Mike Rankin | 2/24/09 7:18 PM
Ethan's Gravatar @ Damon-um let's see, when my government is spending this money to clean up the mess and only the wealthy have come out roses I have the right to vote for it in my politicians. You can vote your way if you want. Personally I think we are beginning to see people realizing concentrations of wealth/reaganomics as the enemy of a fair and balanced economy. They see that the system is setup to keep them in their lower income "place". They are voting that way too.

"I believe that the rich keep getting richer because they keep doing the things that got them rich in the first place. Ditto for the poor. "
-It's sad you believe that. The rich keep getting richer because they game the system and prevent anyone from getting a piece of the pie. The poor stay poor because the system is setup to keep them poor. A monopoly using it's power to maintain the monopoly.

The fair/flat tax will be regressive, with the highest burden falling on the lower middle class and working poor who happen to be the vast majority of people and can afford it the least.

http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/files/bart...
# Posted By Ethan | 2/24/09 8:22 PM
ethan's Gravatar And if your family is making enough that some chunk is taxed at that rate- I think it's totally fine. If they can't manage to live on that then they need a financial advisor. Sorry I just don't think that it's an issue-hyper wealth is not guaranteed at the expense of the health of the whole economy and populous. Rights of the many outweigh rights of the few in this case.
# Posted By ethan | 2/24/09 8:27 PM
Mike Rankin's Gravatar @Ethan - You can't use Bruce Bartlett as a source of argument against the FairTax. He has been discredited over and over and over again. Bartlett believes that the government will have to raise taxes to over 20% of GDP. 20%! (ie, one working person in five is paid for by the other four) He feels that can only happen with another hidden VAT tax in addition to all the other taxes we already have. He is well aware that if the FairTax were to pass, congress would not be able to raise taxes to that degree without major political blowback. The FairTax makes the bill the government sends us visible. It puts control of your life back in your hands.

How exactly are the rich preventing anyone from getting a bigger piece of the pie? Are the ultra-wealthy preventing you from getting the best paying job you can find? Are they preventing you from starting your own business? Have they paid thugs to prevent you from entering a college you've been accepted to?

Class mobility is actually possible in this company. There are many high-school educated millionaires in this country. What is the biggest impediment to someone improving their lot in life? Parasitic government taxation. It effectively reduces your income by 30-50%.

I hate to be put in the position of defending the ultra-rich, but they really are just not the problem. You seem to think that they spend all day just packing their mattresses with cash. That's about the only way I can see that they would take money out of the economy.

Think about what they do with their wealth. They either spend it, which creates jobs and economic activity. Or they save it in a bank, which provides capital for banks to lend for other investments, which creates jobs and economic activity. Or they invest it, which is the same as sticking it in the bank. No where did they do anything to prevent you from pursuing your goals.

The FairTax is less regressive than the current system. The payroll taxes on wages and embedded in every product we buy is taxed on the very first dollar. Under the FairTax, everyone is exempt from paying any tax on goods and services up to the poverty level.

One of the biggest problems we have with the current income tax is that 40% of the country isn't paying any. When you rob Peter to pay Paul, it's easy to get Paul to support the program, no matter how unfair it is.

Ethan, you're obviously rich. You need to do your part for the country and send any amounts that you make over twice the poverty level (http://travel.state.gov/visa/immigrants/info/info_...) here -> http://www.fms.treas.gov/faq/moretopics_gifts.html.... Anybody keeping more than that is just greedy and evokes feelings of petty jealousy.
# Posted By Mike Rankin | 2/25/09 5:37 AM
Jeff's Gravatar Watching Obama's speech is seemed like all he wanted to do was to spend money. I have a few ideas...

...how about making it easier for businesses to employee people? to conduct business in the US? to expand, grow, etc.

All I saw was about how the government can give away money. What about the government just allowing people and business to do what they do? We currently spend close to $500 BILLION on service to the national debt every year. Think about that! Over the past 8 years we've spent almost $3 TRILLION servicing the debt and that number isn't going down.

Debt is what got us into this problem, debt isn't going to get us out, it's only going to make it worse. Unless of course, we get some nice 15-20% inflation for a few years that will get rid of debt fast.

If Obama were smart, he'd have named Dave Ramsey as his SecTreas.
# Posted By Jeff | 2/25/09 5:46 AM
Steve's Gravatar You could take all of the wealth from everyone in our entire country and it wouldn't make a dent in the 50-60 trillion dollar national debt.

My question is where is all of the bailout money coming from? The bailout fairy seems to have his own printing press and it's working overtime.
# Posted By Steve | 2/25/09 8:41 AM
BlogCFC was created by Raymond Camden. This blog is running version 5.9.2.002. Contact Blog Owner
back to my home page back to my home page my clients my resume about me navtrak - gps tracking